We discuss
the determination of quality in studies
using Grounded Theory Method (GTM). We concretely
describe some misunderstandings associated
with GTM and some malaises experienced with
its orthodox application, drawing primarily
upon our own research experience and supporting
our discussion with evidence from other
researchers. We then confront our experience
with current critical GTM literature and
offer some observations of our own. We describe
how the very strengths of GTM run the risk
of being undermined – and thus the
quality of such research impaired –
by an overly orthodox application of its
rigorous objectification procedures and
offer some pragmatic remedial suggestions.
We conclude by calling for the continuing
use of GTM in some of its newer forms, and
by reflecting on the importance of the process
surrounding the use of the method, particularly
in doctoral research.
|
